Posts Tagged ‘Utah LAC’
During a recent conversation with a client, I was asked about the Legislative Action Committee (LAC) and how I felt the committee was doing. In response, I outlined a little about the LAC. The organization consists of five unit owners living in community associations. Most are either current or past board members in their communities. There are five community association managers. These managers work exclusively with community associations. There are also five business partners. Four of these are lawyers specializing in HOA law. Their respective law firms are devoted to representing community associations and individuals living in these communities. I hold a CIRMS (Community Insurance Risk Management Specialist) designation. Additionally, we have a lobbyist and an executive director. A subcommittee is being formed which will comprise individuals who will review proposed legislation, particularly during the legislative session.
The second part of my client’s was how I felt the LAC was doing. My response was that “the proof is in the pudding.” The LAC has successfully opposed or altered adverse legislation and has worked with lawmakers to promote and pass favorable legislation. We also have maintained a strong rapport with the Utah State Legislature. Both the current Senate President (Wayne Niederhauser) and the Speaker of the House (Greg Hughes) have carried community association legislation drafted by the LAC. That was prior to their assuming their current leadership roles. Both continue to demonstrate a commitment to good HOA law.
My client responded that he did not consider all legislation affecting community associations passed over the past few years to be perfect. I told him that I believe most, if not all, members of the LAC share the same perspective. However, he must remember that nothing is easy when it comes to legislation. There will nearly always be those with a differing view. Diversity is not a bad thing. I added that it is not uncommon to have a wide range of views and opinions regarding any given topic among the LAC committee members. This can be attributed to the fact that our members are not appointed to the committee because of a particular set of harmonious values that match a predetermined profile, but rather because they have sustained active engagement in community associations and have a willingness and desire to serve.
My plea to him is the same I will leave with you: Be involved in your community. Involvement is a road with many intersecting throughways. The pathway starts with simply being a good neighbor. Serve and be a positive influence in your community.
LaMond Woods, CIRMS
SentryWest Insurance Services
Read about the LAC’s most recent activity in “Resolving Ambiguities: Moving to a Sensible Middle,” by LAC Chair, LaMond Woods from the 3rd quarter issue UCCAI’s newsletter, Community Living, here.
Community Association Institute Utah Legislative Action Committee
February 9, 2010
The CAI ULAC (Community Association Institute Utah Legislative Action Committee) has considered the “transfer fee” issue and takes the following position.
A few developers and/or owners of property are recording documents on the title to real property that require payments by future owners to either the party recording the document or a third party. These payments are triggered upon any sale or transfer of the home, in perpetuity. This practice is problematic because (1) as people take title to the home, they may not be provided with full disclosure regarding these future obligations; (2) this causes a potentially permanent reduction in the value of the property to the current and future owners either through the direct effect of the payment or through the threat of litigation and legal entanglements arising from the obligation; (3) the recorded document could negatively impact and/or restrain the future transfer of the property for purposes other than existing uses; and (4) this causes what is perceived to be a generally unfair and unreasonable burden on existing and future owners.
The CAI ULAC Position.
The CAI ULAC takes the position the particular practice described above should be outlawed because it is unfair, unreasonable, and contrary to the long term best interests of both individual owners and community associations.
Concerns Related to Potential Legislation on this Issue
The CAI ULAC is concerned that legislation aimed at solving the problem could inadvertently affect community associations (condominiums / PUDs) by outlawing appropriate administrative set-up charges. In addition, it could inadvertently, and without full consideration, impact or outlaw other fees that are required to be paid by owners in community associations.
The following is a description of certain types of charges and fees payable upon a transfer of a home along with CAI ULAC’s position on each type of charge:
(1) An administrative Set-up Charge payable upon any transfer of a home in a community association, that is payable to the association and is to compensate the association for real costs associated with the transfer, such as bookkeeping updates and changes, FHA and other lender and guarantor information and compliance requests, management charges, and producing and distributing welcome packets.
CAI ULAC’s Position. The CAI ULAC supports this type of administrative Set-up Charge and believes that any legislation should not prevent this type of charge. The transfer of a home does impose actual administrative costs on an association that can and should be compensated for by the Owners of the home that is being transferred.
(2) Fees payable only upon the first transfer of the home in a community association, that are payable to the association for whatever purpose (reserves, operations, etc).
CAI ULAC’s Position. The CAI ULAC supports this type of charge and believes that any legislation should not prevent this type of charge. This type of charge is equally shared by all owners, is arguably born by the original developer or declarant of the community association, and is generally viewed as a good way to fund either reserves or operations in the early stages of a community association.
(3) Fees payable upon any transfer of a home in a community association, that are payable to the association, for any purpose other than to compensate the association for administrative charges associated with the transfer of the home. Such fees might be to supplement reserves, for specific operational expenses, or for general unspecified operations.
CAI ULAC’s Position. The CAI ULAC takes no position on this type of fee. There are competing policy concerns, some of which weigh in favor of permitting these types of fees and some of which weigh in favor of outlawing these types of fees. The CAI ULAC takes no position on this issue and leaves to its members, members of CAI, and other industry representatives to advocate any position on their own behalf.
John Morris, Esq. Chairman CAI ULAC